badminton: be popular in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.65
, tennis
Weight: 0.36
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.36
, snooker
Weight: 0.36
, squash
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in australia 1.00
be popular in malaysia 0.85
be popular in denmark 0.84
be popular in indonesia 0.79
be popular in asia 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be popular in australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(tennis, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tennis, be popular in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in asia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in asia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in asia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in asia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tennis, be popular in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)