badminton: be popular in denmark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.65
, tennis
Weight: 0.36
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.36
, snooker
Weight: 0.36
, squash
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in denmark 1.00
be popular in indonesia 0.84
be popular in australia 0.84
be popular in malaysia 0.83
is popular 0.79
be popular in olympics 0.79
be popular in asia 0.79
be popular in china 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(game, is popular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sport, is popular)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sport, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(game, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in australia)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(game, is popular)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sport, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(snooker, be popular in china)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, be popular in china)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tennis, be popular in australia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(snooker, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sport, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(game, is popular)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sport, is popular)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(tennis, be popular in australia)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tennis, be popular in australia)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(table tennis, be popular in china)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(table tennis, be popular in china)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tennis, is popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(tennis, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(table tennis, is popular)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(table tennis, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(snooker, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(snooker, is popular)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(snooker, be popular in china)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(snooker, be popular in china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in asia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(badminton, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(badminton, be popular in olympics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in asia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in olympics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(badminton, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in asia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(badminton, be popular in olympics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(badminton, is popular)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in indonesia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in malaysia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is popular)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in olympics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in asia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sport, is popular)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(snooker, be popular in china)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(table tennis, be popular in china)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tennis, be popular in australia)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(snooker, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(tennis, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(table tennis, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sport, be popular in australia)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sport, is popular)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(badminton, be popular in denmark)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, is popular)