bag: be disposed of more effectively

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping bag
Weight: 0.78
, kit
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.59
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.73
, suitcase
Weight: 0.68
, purse
Weight: 0.68
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.68
, carrier bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be disposed of more effectively 1.00
be disposed of effectively 0.99
be disposed 0.91
be disposed of 0.91
is efficiently 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, is efficiently)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suitcase, is efficiently)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(suitcase, is efficiently)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(bag, be disposed of more effectively)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bag, be disposed of)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(bag, be disposed of)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(bag, be disposed of)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bag, be disposed of)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bag, be disposed of more effectively)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bag, be disposed of more effectively)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bag, be disposed of more effectively)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(suitcase, is efficiently)