bag: was banned from california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping bag
Weight: 0.78
, kit
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.59
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.73
, suitcase
Weight: 0.68
, purse
Weight: 0.68
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.68
, carrier bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
was banned from california 1.00
be shipped to california 0.84
is banned 0.80
be made in usa 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, be shipped to california)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bag, was banned from california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(item, be shipped to california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(item, be shipped to california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, be shipped to california)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bag, was banned from california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bag, was banned from california)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bag, be made in usa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bag, be made in usa)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(bag, be made in usa)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bag, be made in usa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bag, was banned from california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bag, was banned from california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, be shipped to california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bag, was banned from california)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, be shipped to california)