bagel: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sandwich
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, burrito
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
has quality prices 0.93
has quality good 0.80
has quality plus 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality price)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(muffin, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(burrito, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bagel, has quality price)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(burrito, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(burrito, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(muffin, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(muffin, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(bagel, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality prices)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bagel, has quality prices)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bagel, has quality prices)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bagel, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality plus)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bagel, has quality plus)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality prices)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(bagel, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bagel, has quality plus)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality plus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bagel, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(burrito, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(muffin, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(bagel, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)