bagel: taste better in new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sandwich
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, burrito
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better in new york 1.00
taste better in york 0.99
be in better new york 0.95
be in new york better 0.95
be good in new york 0.93
be in better york 0.93
be in york better 0.93
be in new york 0.91
be good in york 0.91
be popular in new york 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be in new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sandwich, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be in new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bagel, be in new york better)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(bagel, be in york better)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bagel, be in new york better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bagel, be in york better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bagel, be in better new york)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in new york better)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bagel, be good in new york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bagel, be good in york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bagel, be good in york)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bagel, be in better new york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bagel, be in new york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(bagel, be good in york)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in better new york)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bagel, be popular in new york)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(bagel, be good in new york)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in new york better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(bagel, be in new york)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bagel, be good in new york)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in new york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bagel, be popular in new york)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be good in york)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in better new york)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bagel, be popular in new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be good in new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in new york)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be popular in new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bagel, taste better in new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bagel, taste better in new york)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sandwich, be in new york)