baghdad: was great place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents capital
Weight: 0.59
, city
Weight: 0.58
, hot spot
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, mexico city
Weight: 0.33
, new york city
Weight: 0.33
, charleston
Weight: 0.33
, karachi
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was great place live 1.00
be bad place live 0.92
be worst place live 0.83
was perfect place for new capital 0.80
was perfect place for capital 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be worst place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(mexico city, be worst place live)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be worst place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(baghdad, was great place live)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(baghdad, be bad place live)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(baghdad, be bad place live)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(baghdad, be bad place live)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(baghdad, be bad place live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(baghdad, be worst place live)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(baghdad, be worst place live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(baghdad, be worst place live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(baghdad, be worst place live)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(baghdad, was perfect place for capital)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(baghdad, was perfect place for new capital)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(baghdad, was perfect place for capital)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(baghdad, was perfect place for new capital)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baghdad, was perfect place for capital)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(baghdad, was perfect place for new capital)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(baghdad, was perfect place for capital)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(baghdad, was perfect place for new capital)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(baghdad, was great place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(baghdad, was great place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(baghdad, was great place live)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(mexico city, be worst place live)