bail: be vs bond funds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.59
, detail
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, matter
Weight: 0.49
, order
Weight: 0.48
Siblings cardiac arrest
Weight: 0.33
, parole
Weight: 0.32
, court case
Weight: 0.32
, curfew
Weight: 0.31
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs bond funds 1.00
be vs bond 0.93
be versus bond 0.87
has consistency bond 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bail, be vs bond funds)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(bail, be vs bond)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bail, be versus bond)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(bail, be vs bond)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bail, be vs bond)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bail, be versus bond)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bail, be vs bond)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bail, be versus bond)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bail, be versus bond)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bail, has consistency bond)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bail, has consistency bond)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(bail, has consistency bond)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(bail, has consistency bond)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(bail, be vs bond funds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bail, be vs bond funds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bail, be vs bond funds)