baker: has fatness fat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.57
, job
Weight: 0.57
, distributor
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, merchant
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cook
Weight: 0.33
, chef
Weight: 0.33
, caterer
Weight: 0.33
, grocer
Weight: 0.33
, waiter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has fatness fat 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(baker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cook, has fatness fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(baker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cook, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cook, has fatness fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(baker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(baker, has fatness fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(baker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(baker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(baker, has fatness fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(baker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(baker, has fatness fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(baker, has fatness fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cook, has fatness fat)