baker: wear same clothes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.57
, job
Weight: 0.57
, distributor
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, merchant
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cook
Weight: 0.33
, chef
Weight: 0.33
, caterer
Weight: 0.33
, grocer
Weight: 0.33
, waiter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear same clothes 1.00
wear clothes 0.97
wear hats 0.83
wear white 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cook, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear white)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chef, wear hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chef, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chef, wear hats)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(waiter, wear white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, wear white)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chef, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chef, wear white)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cook, wear white)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cook, wear white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(baker, wear same clothes)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(baker, wear clothes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear clothes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(baker, wear clothes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(baker, wear clothes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear hats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(baker, wear hats)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(baker, wear hats)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(baker, wear white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(baker, wear hats)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(baker, wear white)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(baker, wear white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(baker, wear same clothes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(chef, wear hats)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(waiter, wear white)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cook, wear white)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baker, wear same clothes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chef, wear white)