baking: be popular in montana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.60
, preparation
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, recipe
Weight: 0.46
Siblings cooking
Weight: 0.36
, woodworking
Weight: 0.34
, quilting
Weight: 0.34
, crocheting
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in montana 1.00
is popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(woodworking, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quilting, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(quilting, is popular)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(quilting, is popular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(woodworking, is popular)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(woodworking, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(baking, be popular in montana)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(baking, is popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(baking, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(baking, is popular)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(baking, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(baking, be popular in montana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(baking, be popular in montana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(quilting, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(baking, be popular in montana)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(woodworking, is popular)