baking: is exact science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.60
, preparation
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, recipe
Weight: 0.46
Siblings cooking
Weight: 0.36
, woodworking
Weight: 0.34
, quilting
Weight: 0.34
, crocheting
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is exact science 1.00
is exact 0.92
is science 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cooking, is science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cooking, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cooking, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(baking, is exact science)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(baking, is exact)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(baking, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(baking, is exact)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(baking, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(baking, is exact)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(baking, is science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(baking, is exact)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(baking, is science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(baking, is exact science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(baking, is exact science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(baking, is exact science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cooking, is science)