bald eagle: be at natural habitat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raptor
Weight: 0.71
, eagle
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, black bear
Weight: 0.66
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, unicorn
Weight: 0.36
, raven
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at natural habitat 1.00
be at it natural habitat 1.00
be at habitat 0.95
be at wildlife refuge 0.82
be at protect bird sanctuary 0.78
be at forest 0.77
be at tropical rainforest 0.77
be at in forest 0.77
be at large forest 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(owl, be at in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(owl, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(owl, be at in forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at habitat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at habitat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at habitat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at protect bird sanctuary)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at wildlife refuge)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at habitat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at large forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at large forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at wildlife refuge)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at large forest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at protect bird sanctuary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at protect bird sanctuary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at wildlife refuge)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at protect bird sanctuary)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at large forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at wildlife refuge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(owl, be at in forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bald eagle, be at natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)