bald eagle: were in threatened species list

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raptor
Weight: 0.71
, endangered species
Weight: 0.71
, eagle
Weight: 0.70
, golden eagle
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.68
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, unicorn
Weight: 0.36
, raven
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in threatened species list 1.00
were in species list 0.93
be threatened species 0.93
is threatened species 0.93
is endangered species 0.86
be in endangered 0.84
is endangered 0.83
is species 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(eagle, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(golden eagle, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(endangered species, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(eagle, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, is endangered)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(eagle, is endangered)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered species)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(eagle, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(golden eagle, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is endangered species)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(great horned owl, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is species)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lizard, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be threatened species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be threatened species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(bald eagle, is threatened species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bald eagle, is threatened species)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be threatened species)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, is threatened species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bald eagle, is endangered species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bald eagle, is endangered species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be in endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be in endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, is endangered species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bald eagle, is endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bald eagle, is endangered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bald eagle, is species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bald eagle, is species)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be in endangered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, is endangered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, is species)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be threatened species)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, is threatened species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, is endangered species)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be in endangered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, is endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, is species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(endangered species, is endangered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(golden eagle, is endangered)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eagle, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is species)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is endangered species)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lizard, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(endangered species, is endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(golden eagle, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bald eagle, were in threatened species list) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eagle, is endangered)