ballerina: have ugly feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dancer
Weight: 0.79
, style
Weight: 0.44
, character
Weight: 0.41
, thing
Weight: 0.40
, athlete
Weight: 0.39
Siblings ballet dancer
Weight: 0.36
, barre
Weight: 0.32
, gymnast
Weight: 0.31
, heroine
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have ugly feet 1.00
has physical part feet 0.81
have curved feet 0.80
cut feet 0.79
ice feet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dancer, ice feet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dancer, ice feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dancer, cut feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dancer, ice feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dancer, ice feet)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(ballerina, have ugly feet)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(ballerina, ice feet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballerina, ice feet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballerina, cut feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have curved feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(ballerina, cut feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(ballerina, have curved feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, cut feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ballerina, ice feet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have curved feet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ballerina, cut feet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ballerina, have curved feet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet)