ballet dancer: have ugly feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.52
, dancer
Weight: 0.51
, student
Weight: 0.46
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.36
, pianist
Weight: 0.36
, musician
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have ugly feet 1.00
has physical part feet 0.81
cut feet 0.79
ice feet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dancer, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(dancer, ice feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dancer, cut feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dancer, cut feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(dancer, ice feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, cut feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(dancer, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(dancer, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballerina, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(ballerina, ice feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballerina, ice feet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(ballerina, cut feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballerina, cut feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(ballerina, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ballerina, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, ice feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, cut feet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ballerina, have ugly feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ballerina, has physical part feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ballerina, ice feet)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ballerina, cut feet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(dancer, have ugly feet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(dancer, ice feet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ballet dancer, have ugly feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(dancer, cut feet)