baltimore: is bad city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.62
, port
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings maryland
Weight: 0.62
, new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, miami
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad city 1.00
is city 0.91
is major city 0.84
is special city 0.83
is violent city 0.82
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new york, is major city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(baltimore, is bad city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(new york, is major city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new york, is city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(new york, is major city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(miami, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(miami, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(new york, is major city)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new york city, is city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new york city, is city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, is city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(miami, is city)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(miami, is city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(miami, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(miami, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(baltimore, is bad city)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(baltimore, is city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(baltimore, is violent city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(baltimore, is violent city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is violent city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(baltimore, is violent city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(baltimore, is city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(baltimore, is special city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(baltimore, is city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(baltimore, is special city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(baltimore, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(baltimore, is major city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(baltimore, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(baltimore, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(baltimore, is special city)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is major city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(baltimore, is major city)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is special city)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(baltimore, is major city)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(baltimore, is bad city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new york, is major city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new york city, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philadelphia, is city)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(miami, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(miami, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(baltimore, is bad city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new york, is major city)