bamboo: be good for environment

Related concepts

Parents	wood Weight: 0.77 , fiber Weight: 0.69 , grass Weight: 0.66 , material Weight: 0.66 , fabric Weight: 0.63
Siblings	cypress Weight: 0.38 , mahogany Weight: 0.37 , teak Weight: 0.37 , pine Weight: 0.37 , birch Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for environment	1.00
be bad for environment	0.97
be better for environment	0.96
be good for building	0.78
be good material use	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(wood, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(bamboo, be good for environment)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(wood, be good for building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(bamboo, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(wood, be bad for environment)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(wood, be good for building)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad for environment)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for building)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(pine, be good material use)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(wood, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(wood, be good for building) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(pine, be good material use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(pine, be good material use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(bamboo, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.80

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(bamboo, be bad for environment)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(bamboo, be better for environment)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be bad for environment)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(bamboo, be bad for environment)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be bad for environment)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(bamboo, be better for environment)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be better for environment)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be better for environment)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(bamboo, be good for building)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(bamboo, be good material use)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for building)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be good for building)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bamboo, be good for building)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(bamboo, be good material use)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be good material use)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good material use)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(bamboo, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(pine, be good material use)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(wood, be bad for environment)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(bamboo, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wood, be good for building)