ban: be on halal food supposed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sanction
Weight: 0.63
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.56
, prohibition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings suspension
Weight: 0.36
, moratorium
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.33
, dismissal
Weight: 0.33
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on halal food supposed 1.00
be on halal food 0.98
be on food supposed 0.85
be on food 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(ban, be on halal food supposed)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ban, be on halal food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(ban, be on food supposed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ban, be on halal food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ban, be on food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ban, be on halal food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ban, be on food supposed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ban, be on food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ban, be on halal food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(ban, be on food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(ban, be on food supposed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ban, be on food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ban, be on food supposed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ban, be on halal food supposed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(ban, be on halal food supposed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ban, be on halal food supposed)