banana: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.68
, crop
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.66
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.65
Siblings apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, pineapple
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, mango
Weight: 0.37
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste 0.95
has quality good 0.79
leave bad aftertaste 0.78
is tasty 0.77
is less tasty 0.77
make them sweeter 0.76
has sweetness sweet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(banana, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mango, taste)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pineapple, taste)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pineapple, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mango, has sweetness sweet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pineapple, has sweetness sweet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(banana, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pineapple, taste)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pineapple, taste)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mango, taste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mango, taste)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pineapple, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pineapple, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(pineapple, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pineapple, has sweetness sweet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mango, has sweetness sweet)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(mango, has sweetness sweet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(banana, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(banana, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(banana, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(banana, has sweetness sweet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(banana, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(banana, has sweetness sweet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(banana, has sweetness sweet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(banana, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(banana, has sweetness sweet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(banana, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mango, taste)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pineapple, taste)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(mango, has sweetness sweet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pineapple, has sweetness sweet)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pineapple, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(banana, taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)