band: become famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, ensemble
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.61
, scene
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sonic youth
Weight: 0.73
, orchestra
Weight: 0.72
, rubber band
Weight: 0.70
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.69
, jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
become famous 1.00
is famous 0.91
become popular 0.89
was famous 0.88
become less popular 0.84
be like popular 0.78
be like emmure popular 0.78
is popular 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(scene, is popular)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(band, become famous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(scene, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(scene, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is famous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, was famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(scene, is popular)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(band, become famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ozzy osbourne, is famous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, is famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, was famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, was famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ozzy osbourne, is popular)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, is popular)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(band, become famous)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(band, become less popular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(band, is famous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(band, become less popular)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(band, become less popular)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(band, become less popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(band, is famous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(band, is popular)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(band, is famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, is famous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(band, is popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(band, is popular)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(band, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(band, become famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scene, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ozzy osbourne, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, was famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ozzy osbourne, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(band, become famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scene, is popular)