band: have encores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, ensemble
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.61
, scene
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sonic youth
Weight: 0.73
, orchestra
Weight: 0.72
, rubber band
Weight: 0.70
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.69
, jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have encores 1.00
do encores 0.99
encore 0.87
do encore 0.86
force encore 0.84
play setlist 0.79
play same setlist 0.79
sing songs 0.76
sing same songs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(band, have encores)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(band, do encores)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(band, do encores)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(band, do encores)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(band, do encores)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(band, encore)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(band, encore)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(band, encore)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(band, play same setlist)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(band, encore)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(band, play same setlist)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(band, play same setlist)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(band, play same setlist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(band, have encores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(band, have encores)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(band, have encores)