bank: bank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mortgage lender
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.65
, financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, vehicle
Weight: 0.62
Siblings reserve bank
Weight: 0.76
, online banking
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.68
, hsbc
Weight: 0.68
, merchant
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
bank 1.00
is bank 0.99
be called bank 0.96
need bank 0.95
is good bank 0.95
need central bank 0.88
be called west bank 0.87
be called banks 0.85
be different from banks 0.84
be with big banks 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, is good bank)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, is bank)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, be different from banks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hsbc, is bank)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hsbc, is bank)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hsbc, is good bank)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hsbc, is good bank)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hsbc, be different from banks)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hsbc, be different from banks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bank, bank)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bank, bank)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, bank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bank, bank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hsbc, is bank)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hsbc, be different from banks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, bank)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hsbc, is good bank)