bank: be called financial intermediaries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mortgage lender
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.65
, financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, vehicle
Weight: 0.62
Siblings reserve bank
Weight: 0.76
, online banking
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.68
, hsbc
Weight: 0.68
, merchant
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called financial intermediaries 1.00
be called intermediaries 0.95
be called financial institutions 0.84
need financial statements 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need financial statements)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bank, be called financial intermediaries)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, need financial statements)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need financial statements)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, need financial statements)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bank, be called financial intermediaries)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(bank, be called financial intermediaries)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(bank, be called intermediaries)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bank, be called intermediaries)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(bank, be called intermediaries)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bank, be called intermediaries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bank, need financial statements)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(bank, need financial statements)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bank, need financial statements)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bank, need financial statements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bank, be called financial intermediaries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bank, be called financial intermediaries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need financial statements)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bank, be called financial intermediaries)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need financial statements)