bank: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mortgage lender
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.65
, financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, vehicle
Weight: 0.62
Siblings reserve bank
Weight: 0.76
, online banking
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.68
, hsbc
Weight: 0.68
, merchant
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(online banking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(merchant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hsbc, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(hsbc, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hsbc, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(merchant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(merchant, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(online banking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(online banking, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(bank, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bank, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bank, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hsbc, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(merchant, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(online banking, has quality good)