bar: be important to hrm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to hrm 1.00
be for business important 0.83
be important for business 0.83
be important in business 0.82
be important for event 0.80
be most important aspect of business 0.79
is useful 0.79
be important to filipinos 0.77
is significant 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(location, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(location, be for business important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(location, be important for event)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spot, is significant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(location, be most important aspect of business)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(location, is significant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(location, be important in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(location, be important for event)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(location, be for business important)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(feature, is useful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(location, be important for business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spot, is significant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(location, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(location, be important for business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(location, be for business important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(location, be important for event)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(feature, is useful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(spot, is significant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(location, is significant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(karaoke, be important to filipinos)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(location, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(location, be for business important)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(location, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(location, be important for event)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(location, be most important aspect of business)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spot, is significant)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(karaoke, be important to filipinos)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(karaoke, be important to filipinos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bar, be important to hrm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bar, be important to hrm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(location, be for business important)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(location, be important for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(location, be important for event)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(location, is significant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spot, is significant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(karaoke, be important to filipinos)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(location, is significant)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, be most important aspect of business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(location, be important in business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(location, be important for event)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(location, be for business important)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(location, be important for business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bar, be important to hrm)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spot, is significant)