bar: be in close at 2

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in close at 2 1.00
be closed at 12 0.84
be closed today 0.79
be closed on tuesdays 0.79
come out at night 0.77
is americain closing 0.77
be closed on mondays 0.76
come back in same place 0.76
closed on mondays 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(spot, come out at night)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bar, be in close at 2)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spot, come back in same place)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bar, be in close at 2)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(spot, come back in same place)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(spot, come out at night)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spot, come out at night)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spot, come back in same place)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be closed on tuesdays)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(spot, come out at night)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(spot, come back in same place)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be closed on tuesdays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be closed on tuesdays)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bar, be in close at 2)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(bar, be closed today)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bar, be closed today)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bar, be closed today)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bar, be closed today)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bar, is americain closing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(bar, is americain closing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bar, is americain closing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bar, is americain closing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bar, be in close at 2)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spot, come back in same place)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(spot, come out at night)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be closed on tuesdays)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be closed on mondays)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, closed on mondays)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spot, come back in same place)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bar, be in close at 2)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(spot, come out at night)