bar: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
is hot 0.96
give hot towels 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bar, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, give hot towels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bar, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, give hot towels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, give hot towels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bar, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(bar, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(bar, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bar, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bar, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bar, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bar, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bar, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, give hot towels)