bar: have high tables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high tables 1.00
have tables 0.96
put chairs upside down on tables 0.86
is high 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, is high)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bar stool, is high)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(bar stool, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bar, have high tables)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bar, put chairs upside down on tables)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bar, put chairs upside down on tables)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar, put chairs upside down on tables)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bar, put chairs upside down on tables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bar, have high tables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bar, have high tables)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bar, have high tables)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bar stool, is high)