barber: have red pole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.55
, idiot
Weight: 0.52
Siblings hairdresser
Weight: 0.35
, barbershop
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.34
, hair salon
Weight: 0.34
, handyman
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red pole 1.00
have pole 0.96
have spinning pole 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have pole)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red pole)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(barbershop, have pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have pole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(barber, have red pole)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(barber, have spinning pole)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(barber, have pole)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(barber, have spinning pole)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(barber, have pole)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(barber, have spinning pole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(barber, have pole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(barber, have spinning pole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(barber, have pole)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(barber, have red pole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(barbershop, have pole)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red pole)