barbershop: have poles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, store
Weight: 0.52
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.34
, beauty salon
Weight: 0.34
, barbershop quartet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poles 1.00
have red poles 0.96
have pole 0.86
have red pole 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, have poles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(barber, have pole)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(barber shop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(barber shop, have poles)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(barber, have red pole)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(barber, have red pole)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(barber, have pole)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(barber, have pole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(barbershop, have poles)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have pole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(barbershop, have pole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red pole)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red poles)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red pole)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have pole)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(barbershop, have pole)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red pole)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red poles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(barbershop, have poles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(barber shop, have poles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(barber, have pole)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(barber, have red pole)