barbershop: have red poles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, store
Weight: 0.52
Siblings barber
Weight: 0.35
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salon
Weight: 0.34
, beauty salon
Weight: 0.34
, barbershop quartet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red poles 1.00
have poles 0.96
have red pole 0.90
have pole 0.85
have red 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, have poles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(barber, have red pole)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(barber, have pole)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(barber, have red pole)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(barber, have red pole)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(barber shop, have poles)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(barber shop, have poles)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(barber, have pole)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(barber, have pole)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red poles)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(barbershop, have poles)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(barbershop, have poles)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have poles)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red pole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have pole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red pole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red pole)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(barbershop, have pole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(barbershop, have pole)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red pole)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have poles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have pole)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(barbershop, have red)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(barbershop, have red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(barbershop, have red poles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(barber shop, have poles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(barber, have pole)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barbershop, have red poles)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(barber, have red pole)