barbie: was forteza discovered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.57
, icon
Weight: 0.55
, character
Weight: 0.55
, toy
Weight: 0.55
Siblings barbies
Weight: 0.33
, pepsi
Weight: 0.32
, subaru
Weight: 0.32
, billabong
Weight: 0.31
, burberry
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
was discovered 1.00
was forteza discovered 1.00
was cancelled 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, was discovered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pepsi, was discovered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pepsi, was discovered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(barbie, was forteza discovered)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(barbie, was discovered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(barbie, was discovered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(barbie, was cancelled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(barbie, was cancelled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(barbie, was cancelled)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(barbie, was discovered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(barbie, was discovered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(barbie, was cancelled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(barbie, was forteza discovered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(barbie, was forteza discovered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(barbie, was forteza discovered)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pepsi, was discovered)