barley: be better than dynamike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cereal grain
Weight: 0.80
, crop
Weight: 0.73
, cereal
Weight: 0.67
, grain
Weight: 0.67
, commodity
Weight: 0.66
Siblings wheat
Weight: 0.42
, oat
Weight: 0.40
, corn
Weight: 0.38
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.38
, rye
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than dynamike 1.00
be better than rice 0.78
be more efficient humans eat than for cows 0.77
have more nutrition facts than everything else 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(barley, be better than dynamike)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(barley, be better than dynamike)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wheat, be better than rice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(wheat, be better than rice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wheat, be better than rice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(barley, be better than dynamike)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(barley, be better than rice)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than rice)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(barley, be better than rice)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(barley, be better than rice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(barley, be better than dynamike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wheat, be better than rice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(grain, be more efficient humans eat than for cows)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(barley, be better than dynamike)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(cereal, have more nutrition facts than everything else)