barrel: be in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.58
, detail
Weight: 0.57
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings breech
Weight: 0.40
, rifling
Weight: 0.36
, gas tank
Weight: 0.32
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.32
, cup
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in california 1.00
be in alaska 0.79
be in nj closed on sunday 0.76
is walmart 0.76
be in nj 0.76
be like walmart 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, be in nj closed on sunday)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(barrel, be in california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(store, be in nj closed on sunday)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(store, be in nj closed on sunday)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, is walmart)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cup, is walmart)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, be in nj closed on sunday)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(barrel, be in california)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(wine bottle, is walmart)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, is walmart)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cup, is walmart)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cup, is walmart)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(barrel, be in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barrel, be in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(barrel, be in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(store, be in nj closed on sunday)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(wine bottle, is walmart)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cup, is walmart)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(barrel, be in california)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(store, be in nj closed on sunday)