barrel: improve accuracy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.62
, store
Weight: 0.58
, detail
Weight: 0.57
, obstacle
Weight: 0.56
Siblings breech
Weight: 0.40
, rifling
Weight: 0.36
, gas tank
Weight: 0.32
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.32
, cup
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve accuracy 1.00
is accurate 0.76
is more accurate 0.75
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cup, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(barrel, improve accuracy)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(barrel, is more accurate)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(barrel, is more accurate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(barrel, is accurate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(barrel, is more accurate)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(barrel, is accurate)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(barrel, is accurate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(barrel, is accurate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(barrel, is more accurate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(barrel, improve accuracy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(barrel, improve accuracy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(barrel, improve accuracy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cup, has quality better)