barrister: is striking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents solicitor
Weight: 0.63
, lawyer
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.51
, professional
Weight: 0.51
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.32
, psychologist
Weight: 0.32
, scholar
Weight: 0.31
, lecturer
Weight: 0.31
, psychiatrist
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is striking 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(barrister, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(lecturer, is striking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(barrister, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(lecturer, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(lecturer, is striking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(barrister, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(barrister, is striking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(barrister, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(barrister, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(barrister, is striking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(barrister, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(barrister, is striking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(barrister, is striking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lecturer, is striking)