baseball field: have different dimensions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soccer field
Weight: 0.84
, football field
Weight: 0.74
, field
Weight: 0.73
, sport
Weight: 0.70
Siblings basketball court
Weight: 0.71
, baseball team
Weight: 0.40
, baseball game
Weight: 0.40
, baseball player
Weight: 0.39
, baseball diamond
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different dimensions 1.00
have dimensions 0.97
be different sizes 0.79
is different sizes 0.79
CAN can different sizes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soccer field, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(soccer field, is different sizes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, is different sizes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(baseball diamond, is different sizes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soccer field, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(baseball diamond, is different sizes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(baseball diamond, is different sizes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(baseball field, have different dimensions)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(baseball field, have dimensions)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, have dimensions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(baseball field, have dimensions)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(baseball field, have dimensions)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, be different sizes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, is different sizes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, CAN can different sizes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(baseball field, CAN can different sizes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(baseball field, CAN can different sizes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(baseball field, be different sizes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(baseball field, is different sizes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(baseball field, CAN can different sizes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(baseball field, be different sizes)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(baseball field, is different sizes)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(baseball field, be different sizes)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(baseball field, is different sizes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soccer field, is different sizes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(baseball diamond, is different sizes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(baseball field, have different dimensions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(soccer field, is different sizes)