baseball player: wear pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents basketball player
Weight: 0.81
, player
Weight: 0.73
, football player
Weight: 0.73
, sport
Weight: 0.69
Siblings baseball
Weight: 0.64
, pitcher
Weight: 0.58
, infielder
Weight: 0.44
, baseball game
Weight: 0.40
, baseball team
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear pants 1.00
wear long pants 0.98
wear white pants 0.98
wear baseball pants 0.93
wear socks 0.90
wear striped socks 0.89
wear red socks 0.88
wear 42 0.88
wear red striped socks 0.87
wear jockstraps 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(football player, wear socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear pants)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(football player, wear socks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear socks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(football player, wear socks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(baseball player, wear pants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(baseball player, wear pants)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear white pants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(baseball player, wear white pants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(baseball player, wear white pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear white pants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear pants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(football player, wear socks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(baseball player, wear pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(football player, wear socks)