baseball: be popular in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents baseball player
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, basketball
Weight: 0.62
, game
Weight: 0.61
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.64
, golf
Weight: 0.58
, second baseman
Weight: 0.58
, pitching
Weight: 0.49
, dodgers
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in canada 1.00
be popular in mexico 0.84
be popular in japan 0.80
be unpopular in europe 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(baseball, be popular in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(baseball, be popular in japan)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(baseball, be popular in japan)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(baseball, be popular in mexico)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(baseball, be popular in japan)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(baseball, be popular in japan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(baseball, be popular in mexico)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(baseball, be unpopular in europe)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(baseball, be popular in mexico)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(baseball, be unpopular in europe)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(baseball, be unpopular in europe)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(baseball, be popular in mexico)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(baseball, be unpopular in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(baseball, be popular in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(baseball, be popular in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(baseball, be popular in canada)