baseball: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents baseball player
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.62
, basketball
Weight: 0.62
, game
Weight: 0.61
Siblings home run
Weight: 0.64
, golf
Weight: 0.58
, second baseman
Weight: 0.58
, pitching
Weight: 0.49
, dodgers
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1.00
was inveted 0.78
was in 1920s 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(baseball, was named)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(basketball, was named)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was named)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(baseball, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(baseball, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(baseball, was in 1920s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(baseball, was in 1920s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(baseball, was in 1920s)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(baseball, was in 1920s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(baseball, was inveted)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(baseball, was inveted)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(baseball, was inveted)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(baseball, was inveted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(baseball, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(baseball, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(basketball, was named)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(basketball, was named)