basic: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.67
, language
Weight: 0.59
, level
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, program
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fundamental
Weight: 0.34
, english language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.32
, common sense
Weight: 0.32
, italian language
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality right 0.88
is bad thing 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(basic, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(basic, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(basic, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fundamental, has quality right)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(basic, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fundamental, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(fundamental, has quality right)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(basic, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(basic, has quality right)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(basic, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(basic, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(basic, has quality right)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(basic, has quality right)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality right)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(basic, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fundamental, has quality right)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(basic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)