basic: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.67
, language
Weight: 0.59
, level
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, program
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fundamental
Weight: 0.34
, english language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.32
, common sense
Weight: 0.32
, italian language
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is thing 0.94
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(basic, is bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(basic, is bad thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(basic, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(basic, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(basic, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(basic, is thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(basic, is thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(basic, is thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basic, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(basic, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(basic, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(basic, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(basic, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(basic, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(basic, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)