basketball team: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.79
, program
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, student
Weight: 0.58
, event
Weight: 0.58
Siblings football team
Weight: 0.79
, squad
Weight: 0.52
, baseball team
Weight: 0.40
, lacrosse
Weight: 0.38
, football
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(basketball team, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(football, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(lacrosse, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(squad, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(squad, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(squad, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(football, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(football, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(lacrosse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lacrosse, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(basketball team, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(basketball team, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(basketball team, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(basketball team, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(basketball team, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(squad, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(football, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lacrosse, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(basketball team, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)