basketball: was named

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coach
Weight: 0.65
, high school
Weight: 0.64
, sports team
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.68
, football
Weight: 0.66
, baseball
Weight: 0.62
, soccer
Weight: 0.59
, basketball player
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
was named 1.00
was named basketball 0.83
was invvented 0.78
was invetind 0.78
was ivented 0.78
was invinted 0.78
was invetnted 0.78
was was invented 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(baseball, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(baseball, was named)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(baseball, was named)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(basketball, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(basketball, was ivented)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(basketball, was invvented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(basketball, was named basketball)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(basketball, was invetnted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(basketball, was ivented)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(basketball, was invetind)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(basketball, was invvented)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(basketball, was invetind)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(basketball, was invetind)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(basketball, was invinted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(basketball, was ivented)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(basketball, was was invented)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was invetind)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(basketball, was invetnted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(basketball, was invvented)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(basketball, was named basketball)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(basketball, was invetnted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(basketball, was invinted)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(basketball, was was invented)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(basketball, was named basketball)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(basketball, was invinted)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(basketball, was was invented)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was invinted)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was was invented)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was invvented)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was invetnted)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was ivented)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was named basketball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(basketball, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(basketball, was named)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(baseball, was named)