bat: has physical part fangs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, enemy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings vampire bat
Weight: 0.73
, fruit bat
Weight: 0.68
, batting order
Weight: 0.58
, bunt
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fangs 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.86
has physical part eyes 0.78
has physical part skin 0.77
has physical part wings 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(enemy, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part fangs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(enemy, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(enemy, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(enemy, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fruit bat, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, has physical part teeth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bat, has physical part fangs)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bat, has physical part teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bat, has physical part teeth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part skin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(bat, has physical part wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(bat, has physical part wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part wings)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part wings)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part eyes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bat, has physical part skin)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bat, has physical part eyes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(bat, has physical part eyes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(bat, has physical part skin)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part eyes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bat, has physical part fangs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(enemy, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fruit bat, has physical part teeth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bat, has physical part fangs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(enemy, has physical part eyes)