bbq: be at backyard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents favorite
Weight: 0.59
, sauce
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, event
Weight: 0.53
, sandwich
Weight: 0.52
Siblings barbecue
Weight: 0.35
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.33
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.33
, curry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at backyard 1.00
be at backyard of house 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at backyard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(barbecue, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(barbecue, be at backyard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bbq, be at backyard)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bbq, be at backyard of house)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bbq, be at backyard of house)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be at backyard of house)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bbq, be at backyard of house)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be at backyard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bbq, be at backyard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at backyard)