bbq: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents favorite
Weight: 0.59
, sauce
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, event
Weight: 0.53
, sandwich
Weight: 0.52
Siblings barbecue
Weight: 0.35
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.33
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.33
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.33
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
CAN good 0.81
taste good 0.79
is damn good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sauce, is quality)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sandwich, is damn good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sauce, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is damn good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sauce, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sauce, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is damn good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(sauce, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sauce, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sauce, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sandwich, is damn good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bbq, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(barbecue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(barbecue, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hot sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(apple sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple sauce, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(barbecue, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbecue, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bbq, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bbq, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, is quality)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sandwich, is damn good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(barbecue, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(barbecue, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot sauce, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sauce, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(bbq, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sandwich, is damn good)