bc: be best place live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.52
, city
Weight: 0.51
, item
Weight: 0.50
, program
Weight: 0.49
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.33
, lexington
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33
, victoria
Weight: 0.33
, montreal
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best place live 1.00
be good place live 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be good place live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(montreal, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(montreal, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(bc, be best place live)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bc, be good place live)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bc, be good place live)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bc, be good place live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bc, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bc, be best place live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bc, be best place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bc, be best place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(montreal, be good place live)