bc: have climates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.52
, city
Weight: 0.51
, item
Weight: 0.50
, program
Weight: 0.49
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.33
, lexington
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33
, victoria
Weight: 0.33
, montreal
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have climates 1.00
have many climates 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(place, have climates)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(bc, have climates)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(place, have climates)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(place, have climates)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(place, have climates)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bc, have climates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(bc, have climates)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(bc, have many climates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bc, have many climates)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(bc, have many climates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(bc, have many climates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bc, have climates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(bc, have climates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(place, have climates)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(bc, have climates)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(place, have climates)